Solved
Seems that they borrowed from R' Amram Gaon's siddur. I suppose I should have read the introductory sections of the book before complaining about it.
Ah well.
Ah well.
posted by Lawrence | 3:36 PM
The Hazzn's Tish
Or: A Cantorial Student's Dispatches from his Outpost in Manhattan
-
Site feed
LJ Feed
My other blog
Apikorsus Online
The Apikorsus Companion v2.0
Baraita
Islamicate
Jerusalem Syndrome
The Kosher Blog
Michelle's Aliyah Adventures
A Rose by Any Other Name
- Siddur variations
- It's funny . . .
- Ain't it grand?
- Brought up by the goings-on of my other blog
- Better late than never
- This is just to say . . .
- Though reports are denied . . .
- Public Service Announcement
- Technical update
- M'rahsh'wan matok!
2 Comments:
But why?
For some stupid reason I left all my Sim Shalom's in the US (though I have plenty of other siddurim here)
From the way the choice is explained in the introduction, I think they just preferred what it said. That's generally Sim Shalom's MO when choosing between minhagim. (They occasionally do it when the predominant minhag appears to be based upon a textual corruption, as in their text for Yigdal, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.)
Post a Comment
<< Home